Cooperating to Implement an EoP Intnl Law Social Contract
Please Note: These EoP RH FR Cooperator principles would NOT be of interest to individuals who (a) personally have no interest in non-violent root cause problem solving; and/or (b) no objections to physical violence being inflicted on responsible freedom individuals who sincerely do support non-violent root cause problem solving.
These EoP RH FR Cooperator principles should be of interest for individuals who (a) are personally interested in non-violent root cause problem solving cooperation; and/or (b) object to physical violence being inflicted on responsible freedom practicing individuals who sincerely do support non-violent root cause problem solving; there are many ways to cooperate; such as for example:
Not Sure about EoP RH FR Hypothesis:
Testing of EoP RH FR Hypothesis:
The ‘Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality’ aka EoP RH FR principles could be described as a – communication and cooperative truthseeking resource conflict problem solving advocacy behavioral path – ‘Factual Reality’ hypothesis.
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool..
Scientifically: Any hypothesis is proven accurate or inaccurate through experiments and testing of the hypothesis for errors; with amendments of any erroneous principles of the hypothesis if or when experiments expose such errors.
The accurate scientifically based factual reality legal conclusion about an untested hypothesis is: The hypothesis may or may not be accurate. Until the accuracy of the hypothesis is impartially experimentally tested; it is unknown whether the hypothesis is accurate or not.
Sincere Honourable Critic:
Sincere – aka ego literate – constructive criticism to expose errors in EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles. If the EoP RH FR principles are in error, the sooner they are proven so; the sooner they can be amended or discarded as incorrect.
Could you clarify in a reasonable summary; what the factual and scientific principles are that the Alt Rights’s ‘factually and scientifically based worldview’ is based upon?
[..] If you are interested in a truthseeking enquiry discussion about which of your working hypothesis conclusions are based upon facts and science and which are not; that’s fine. Let’s cooperate and engage in a truthseeking enquiry. I’ll engage in a sincere – aka egological literate – truthseeking discussion with anyone, neo-nazi to Stalinist extremist; I don’t care.
If you are addicted to being right and shoving your racial, religious or class ideological bullshit down everyones throats, while blaming Zionists, communists, black, whites, rich, poor; keep drinking your Masonic War is Peace fuck honour and fuck ecological carrying capacity limits reality bullshit the public relations propaganda mindfuck games koolaid.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 20 Dec: Occidental Observer .. Radical Honesty.
If they are 40 sincere Generals/Admirals whose priority is problem solving cooperation; with a few hundred or thousand similarly sincere soldiers, they could implement deindustrialization and humane and orderly depopulation of over 6 billion of the planets parasites within less than 2-5 years; if they really wanted to.
There are various options; it would depend on (a) what mass-killing technology the Generals/Admirals have direct ‘finger on the button’ access to; or what killing technology their soldiers are willing to strategically occupy for strategic killing or negotiating purposes; (b) their ability to quickly target and eliminate those whom they have agreed upon to be the combatants; with legal authority – police, prosecutors, judges – support.
[..] There are many options; which depend on among other issues (a) the level of sincere problem solving of decision-makers –vs– ego Mindfuck bullshit image management; (b) military decision-makers access to killing technology and legal support for the implementation of such killing technology; (c) whether their depopulation goals and ‘combatant’ legal definitions are based upon merit irrespective of race, class or religion [Humans: An Endangered Species, by Magistrate Jason Brent]; or Masonic elite human factory farming parasitism; (d) whether their goals are justice or parasitic profiteering; they will use different levels of white – gray – black information quality operations; to recruit fellow sincere problem solving peers or human factory farming sperm donor / brood sow cannon fodder; etc.
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP AlSisi: 01 Nov: Stephen Filipiak: Aloha Gambia Natural Farming & Knock Knock Uganda PC Mortal Kombat; Ernesto Sirolli: Want to help someone? Shut up and listen.
» IG: 17-03-19_whatawaytogo.
Pretty Sure about EoP RH FR Hypothesis:
EoP RH FR Advocacy & Socio-Cultural Practice:
Engage in Advocacy – educating others and yourself, including through socio-cultural practice of the issues you are educating others on –of EoP Scientific & Cultural Law; Eco & Egological Literacy; on your path towards being confident about your capability to sign and uphold your Responsible Freedom oath.
Sign Your Responsible Freedom Oath:
Civilian or Former Military: Sign Your Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath; and submit it to EoP MILED Clerk [eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za] to be published at EoP Axis Oath.
Former or Current Military or Law Enforcement: If you are a military or law enforcement official; you can also submit your Responsible Freedom Oath to NSA: Adm Rogers or FSB: Gen Bortnikov, as suggested in 28 Sep: EoP Obs re: hacking of eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za and 29 Sep: EoP App, FSB & NSA: EoP Obs re: Hacking of eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za. Updated Info available at EoP v WiP Military.
Responsible Freedom Oath templates are available at EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]
Pro Bono Assistance of Counsel:
Any legal pro-bono assistance of counsel to (a) more accurately clarify any EoP concept or statement; (b) file – or refile – any legal application so that it may meet (i) reasonable pro se technical filing standards to any courts where it may have been declined for such reasons, if legal assistance provided is assistance of counsel/standby counsel, etc. EoP MILED Clerk requests for Assistance of Counsel correspondence to various attorneys and judges; can be read in full at: EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants: Request Assistance of Counsel.
Ego and Ecological Literacy Socio-Cultural Arbitrators and Jury Practice:
Advocacy and education of ecologically and egologically literate arbitrators and/or jury members will enable your community to quickly, amicably and impartially resolve resource disputes, outside of current or impending WiP Legal Matchstick Bridge collapse court proceedings; saving your resources to enable other benefits for your community.
If you want to appoint another Current or Former EoP Applicant, whom you have greater respect for gender, racial or religious reasonable impartiality or fairness to yourself, than myself; to act as a jury member on your behalf; whose feedback I shall be happy to consider, on your behalf, include such jury members name, in writing, including a written request to them to act in a jury capacity on behalf of yourself, with regard to these allegations. If they consent, they shall be required to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.
If your preferred alternative jury member is not a Current or Former EoP Applicant, they shall need to provide you and me with a written statement, that they shall hold themselves accountable to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 22 Feb: HR McMaster, E Prince: #2 Notice re: Accused War Criminals in ICC Complaint.
Support Legal Certainty Confirmation:
If you sincerely believe EoP RH FR principles to be accurate, you can provide advocacy and support for their legal certainty confirmation as legal observable factual reality, either in your own nation or by supporting the EoP NTE GMA cabinet to be implemented.
Strategic Use of your Acquired Scarcity Combatant Resources:
Use your scarcity combatant acquired resources to support EoP STRATINT; such as for example:
According to [the EoP EcoFootprint] legal definition, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, Rex Tillerson’s procreation and consumption eco-footprint would qualify them for ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal convictions.
Necessity Nullification of War Criminal Conviction or Mitigation of Sentencing:
To the extent that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – proved that he used his ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources to cooperate to change the course of his nation or the Planet’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for his nation and the planet; his scarcity combatant war criminal conviction would be nullified by the principle of objective and/or subjective political or military necessity.
To the extent that the Prosecutor proved that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – used his ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal resources to (i) negligently or consciously and/or deliberately obstruct the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; he would be convicted, and sentenced to (ii) re-education classes on any of the egological or ecological literacy issues he was illiterate about, resulting in his negligent actions; or (ii) elimination from the planetary genepool, according to his state assisted suicide preference.
To the extent that my observations and interpretations are proven accurate by evidence:
Vladimir Putin & Barack Obama would be found Innocent; Erik Prince, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson would be convicted as negligent and/or consciously deliberate scarcity combatant war criminals.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 19 Jan: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions.
There are many more ways to cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. Hopefully some of the aforementioned ideas are helpful for individuals wondering how they can cooperate to support the implementation of an EoP social contract to enable orderly and humane depopulation and deindustrialization.
Last Updated: 01 Oct 2017.